I suspect that people who look to Google or the Trusted News Initiative to fact check Died Suddenly are not the people who are going to watch Died Suddenly.
The people who watch Died Suddenly probably already know people who have died or been injured, and have already realized that Google and TNI and (misnomer) MSM are lying.
So these people will be where a lot of us were a long time ago: sifting through lots of conflicting information.
If there are a couple of flaws in a movie that otherwise sheds light on the dramatic findings of embalmers, we skeptics are wringing our hands over how mendacious fact-checkers will pounce on these errors.
On the other side of the fence, the 'authorities' are advising people to inject toxic garbage into pregnant women and ingest expensive and pointless meds and take psych pills based on a theory cooked up by a marketing dept and get failed ebola drugs for covid and all the other follies of medicine. They don't seem to worry overmuch about it though.
One set of errors here causes death and ill health, and the other causes what harm? Embarrassment?
I, too, would prefer very carefully vetted presentations of evidence, but they simply won't penetrate the veil of official myths for most people. The most effective part of the movie is the part where they show the fibrous clots being pulled out from the recently deceased in the context of these clots being shown in many vials pulled from many corpses. The live removal shows that it isn't just some mystery substance that someone faked.
I really appreciate your take on Died Suddenly. My wife and I watched it last night and even though I’ve been very aware of these clotting issues, it was still shocking to see them being pulled out of dead bodies. I know there are some mistakes made in it (esp that huge clot being removed from the beating heart), but the facts of grainy micro clots and those long fibrous clots shouldn’t be ignored, and I’m hoping it gets more people’s attention maybe waking more up to the truth of these mRNA shots. Unfortunately the fact checkers and mainstream media will focus on the few mistakes and probably succeed at discrediting it.
My husband and I said the exact same thing about this documentary. Should have shortened it to focus on the most compelling parts, which are the concerning and unusual clots found by embalmers. Starting the documentary with a Grateful-Dead-inspired-psychedelic-big-foot-intro made me cringe. I could see how my medical friends/colleagues could total dismiss the whole thing on this alone, would just stop watching. As a RN I do believe we’ve got to bolster our cause with as much fact based/data based material couched in compelling packages. I’m afraid this documentary is only more fodder for the fire of ‘Oh those crazy antivax conspiracy theorists.’ The Died Suddenly title also didn’t prove itself out during the film as we saw maybe a dozen or so people falling out with no further information on their outcomes or deaths. We didn’t hear the back stories on any of it. While it was a good start we need to do better. I feel like Del Bigtree at High Wire has done an excellent job of delicately balancing the facts and the compelling emotional component of the COVID topic. Anyhow, Thanks for your work sir! I am grateful to know I still have fellow critical thinking medical professional colleagues. Most days I feel like a lonely anomaly!
Excellent piece, thank you doctor. I don’t feel that Stew Peters needs to be treated quite so gently. He is an inflammatory host and peddles all kinds of crazy stuff like the “snake venom theory” debunked beautifully by the great Dr. Pierre Kory in his substack. But even worse, he is so hyper-partisan, that he turns off the “Blue Anon” crowd we so seek to red-pill. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have made grave, clownish errors throughout this entire pandemic and both still hawk these dangerous genetic biologic injectables. Being more politically balanced in one’s approach while making a movie THIS important, is absolutely critical. I wish Stew Peters would get over himself. He’s really not the person to advocate for the medical freedom movement.
Nov 26, 2022·edited Nov 26, 2022Liked by A Midwestern Doctor
Misfolding can occur, LNPs allow crossing the blood brain barrier, saRNA helps keep churning out of spike protein (or an approximation thereof, given the demanding storage requirements and manufacturing quality); moreover, pH and temperature can change the shape of a protein as it moves within the body.
The United States and with full knowledge of the medical profession has been practicing bio-weapon research on U.S. citizens since the second world war. Indeed the primary defense by the medical docs. found guilty of crimes against humanity and hung from the gallows as a well earned and just punishment, was that U.S. had no right whatsoever, to charge much less convict those valuable doctors of medicine, precisely because the U.S. was practicing the same research against its own citizens before and during that most recent largest European negotiation for territory and power.
Here is a short overview of Japanese bio-weapons "wet work" during WWII:
Here is Billy Boy Clinton purportedly apologizing for U.S. research projects on U.S. citizens, but in reality, he only sheds light on the then already known medical experiments - there were many more which he knew about or ought to have known about. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0NtPJUfcfbu0/
For a deep dive, kindly look into Jonathan D. Moreno's well documented history of bio-warfare research here and abroad, "Undue Risk, Secret State Experiments on Humans", 1999. BTW, more trials were not held at Nuremberg b/c only twenty-four (24) defendant's chairs / seats we made available by design. That is why hundreds, if not thousands of "perps" never saw the inside of a courtroom, aside from the fact that the U.S. was too busy granting immunity to have those scoundrels work for us. I think it's time State Secrets were brought to light and the full weight of the International Law is visited on card carrying members of AMA, Hospital Administrators guilty of murder by Remdesivir for profit, and let's not leave out under any and all circumstances, Walenski, Fauci and boy wonder Gates, lest we want to in effect sentence our children and grandchildren to a repeat performance, over, and over again.
This is brilliant, and totally understandable, and, importantly, doesn't provoke cognitive dissonance shielding (learned that from Rounding the Earth). I wonder if it would be possible for someone to make an addendum with imagery, since that can be pivotal as you say, using your explanations and your transparency around errors? However, even if the presentation was utterly perfect, absolutely without error, Goliath would find an angle to attack it from. I also think your insight about the paradigmatic shift that occurred in plate tectonics when the Navy got pictures of the rifts might really shed light on what we are up against---a paradigm, a false one, like the sun revolves around the earth, purposefully constructed and maintained daily, hourly, through the media and whatever other more obscure mechanisms. Remember in Thomas Kuhn those two old Eastern European scientists who spent their own money every summer to go to sea to try to disproved plate tectonics after it became orthodoxy? I think the paradigm is shifting though the powers that be are like hundreds of thousands of those two old scientists trying to shore it up as what comes next (whatever that is) hinges on the unshakeability of the paradigm.
Someone could even read this on a video as an addendum. I'm terrible at comprehending medical information and you explained this so I could digest it and integrate that understanding. That's a lot! Thank you for all that you do !
Great information here, thank you. Yes, they screwed up some of the info in the movie but until our non-bought-off scientists come out and start producing compelling and accurate documentaries, this is what we have. We are relying on the amateur sleuthers to try and figure this out because our professional organizations have abandoned science or don't have the balls that Stew Peters has to come out with it. I'm hoping this creates more public demand for the answers and accountability that we have been so sorely lacking.
Now THIS is an extremely fair and helpful critique of "Died Suddenly". (Unlike another critique, supposedly from a writer on "our side", and who shall remain nameless, which trashed the movie under the pretext of being a "friendly" critique.)
Much improved video. Without flashes of MKUltra, Big Foot, Tom Hanks, etc.
I received harsh criticism in Celia Farber’s and Kirsch’s substack comments because I dared bring up the gratuitous and false statements made in the film- including interpretation of Gates and the heart clot. How unprofessional and deceitful the producers were, willing to deliberately lie for “views.”
This angered people. What angered me was taking a great opportunity to effectively spread the truth and then ruining it.
I don't imagine I'm alone in being put off by the association of this film with Stew Peters, who appears to be more of an entertainer or grifter than sincere advocate for the truth. That's just my impression though, and I realise I could be wrong.
Here's a question that's been bugging me for months. What does all this clotting and spike protein mean for our blood supply? Here in Canada approx 80% of the population took two or more shots, as the coercion and propaganda was terribly effective. Many of them donate blood. I foresee another blood scandal in the making. What do you think?
The amount of your work that went into this piece doesn't go unnoticed - truly a terrific article
I suspect that people who look to Google or the Trusted News Initiative to fact check Died Suddenly are not the people who are going to watch Died Suddenly.
The people who watch Died Suddenly probably already know people who have died or been injured, and have already realized that Google and TNI and (misnomer) MSM are lying.
So these people will be where a lot of us were a long time ago: sifting through lots of conflicting information.
If there are a couple of flaws in a movie that otherwise sheds light on the dramatic findings of embalmers, we skeptics are wringing our hands over how mendacious fact-checkers will pounce on these errors.
On the other side of the fence, the 'authorities' are advising people to inject toxic garbage into pregnant women and ingest expensive and pointless meds and take psych pills based on a theory cooked up by a marketing dept and get failed ebola drugs for covid and all the other follies of medicine. They don't seem to worry overmuch about it though.
One set of errors here causes death and ill health, and the other causes what harm? Embarrassment?
I, too, would prefer very carefully vetted presentations of evidence, but they simply won't penetrate the veil of official myths for most people. The most effective part of the movie is the part where they show the fibrous clots being pulled out from the recently deceased in the context of these clots being shown in many vials pulled from many corpses. The live removal shows that it isn't just some mystery substance that someone faked.
You're a national treasure
I really appreciate your take on Died Suddenly. My wife and I watched it last night and even though I’ve been very aware of these clotting issues, it was still shocking to see them being pulled out of dead bodies. I know there are some mistakes made in it (esp that huge clot being removed from the beating heart), but the facts of grainy micro clots and those long fibrous clots shouldn’t be ignored, and I’m hoping it gets more people’s attention maybe waking more up to the truth of these mRNA shots. Unfortunately the fact checkers and mainstream media will focus on the few mistakes and probably succeed at discrediting it.
My husband and I said the exact same thing about this documentary. Should have shortened it to focus on the most compelling parts, which are the concerning and unusual clots found by embalmers. Starting the documentary with a Grateful-Dead-inspired-psychedelic-big-foot-intro made me cringe. I could see how my medical friends/colleagues could total dismiss the whole thing on this alone, would just stop watching. As a RN I do believe we’ve got to bolster our cause with as much fact based/data based material couched in compelling packages. I’m afraid this documentary is only more fodder for the fire of ‘Oh those crazy antivax conspiracy theorists.’ The Died Suddenly title also didn’t prove itself out during the film as we saw maybe a dozen or so people falling out with no further information on their outcomes or deaths. We didn’t hear the back stories on any of it. While it was a good start we need to do better. I feel like Del Bigtree at High Wire has done an excellent job of delicately balancing the facts and the compelling emotional component of the COVID topic. Anyhow, Thanks for your work sir! I am grateful to know I still have fellow critical thinking medical professional colleagues. Most days I feel like a lonely anomaly!
Excellent piece, thank you doctor. I don’t feel that Stew Peters needs to be treated quite so gently. He is an inflammatory host and peddles all kinds of crazy stuff like the “snake venom theory” debunked beautifully by the great Dr. Pierre Kory in his substack. But even worse, he is so hyper-partisan, that he turns off the “Blue Anon” crowd we so seek to red-pill. Both the Trump and Biden administrations have made grave, clownish errors throughout this entire pandemic and both still hawk these dangerous genetic biologic injectables. Being more politically balanced in one’s approach while making a movie THIS important, is absolutely critical. I wish Stew Peters would get over himself. He’s really not the person to advocate for the medical freedom movement.
Misfolding can occur, LNPs allow crossing the blood brain barrier, saRNA helps keep churning out of spike protein (or an approximation thereof, given the demanding storage requirements and manufacturing quality); moreover, pH and temperature can change the shape of a protein as it moves within the body.
=> Do not comply.
The United States and with full knowledge of the medical profession has been practicing bio-weapon research on U.S. citizens since the second world war. Indeed the primary defense by the medical docs. found guilty of crimes against humanity and hung from the gallows as a well earned and just punishment, was that U.S. had no right whatsoever, to charge much less convict those valuable doctors of medicine, precisely because the U.S. was practicing the same research against its own citizens before and during that most recent largest European negotiation for territory and power.
Here is a short overview of Japanese bio-weapons "wet work" during WWII:
https://www.laguardia.edu/maus/files/ethics-ch-16.pdf
Here is Billy Boy Clinton purportedly apologizing for U.S. research projects on U.S. citizens, but in reality, he only sheds light on the then already known medical experiments - there were many more which he knew about or ought to have known about. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0NtPJUfcfbu0/
For a deep dive, kindly look into Jonathan D. Moreno's well documented history of bio-warfare research here and abroad, "Undue Risk, Secret State Experiments on Humans", 1999. BTW, more trials were not held at Nuremberg b/c only twenty-four (24) defendant's chairs / seats we made available by design. That is why hundreds, if not thousands of "perps" never saw the inside of a courtroom, aside from the fact that the U.S. was too busy granting immunity to have those scoundrels work for us. I think it's time State Secrets were brought to light and the full weight of the International Law is visited on card carrying members of AMA, Hospital Administrators guilty of murder by Remdesivir for profit, and let's not leave out under any and all circumstances, Walenski, Fauci and boy wonder Gates, lest we want to in effect sentence our children and grandchildren to a repeat performance, over, and over again.
This is brilliant, and totally understandable, and, importantly, doesn't provoke cognitive dissonance shielding (learned that from Rounding the Earth). I wonder if it would be possible for someone to make an addendum with imagery, since that can be pivotal as you say, using your explanations and your transparency around errors? However, even if the presentation was utterly perfect, absolutely without error, Goliath would find an angle to attack it from. I also think your insight about the paradigmatic shift that occurred in plate tectonics when the Navy got pictures of the rifts might really shed light on what we are up against---a paradigm, a false one, like the sun revolves around the earth, purposefully constructed and maintained daily, hourly, through the media and whatever other more obscure mechanisms. Remember in Thomas Kuhn those two old Eastern European scientists who spent their own money every summer to go to sea to try to disproved plate tectonics after it became orthodoxy? I think the paradigm is shifting though the powers that be are like hundreds of thousands of those two old scientists trying to shore it up as what comes next (whatever that is) hinges on the unshakeability of the paradigm.
Someone could even read this on a video as an addendum. I'm terrible at comprehending medical information and you explained this so I could digest it and integrate that understanding. That's a lot! Thank you for all that you do !
Great information here, thank you. Yes, they screwed up some of the info in the movie but until our non-bought-off scientists come out and start producing compelling and accurate documentaries, this is what we have. We are relying on the amateur sleuthers to try and figure this out because our professional organizations have abandoned science or don't have the balls that Stew Peters has to come out with it. I'm hoping this creates more public demand for the answers and accountability that we have been so sorely lacking.
Now THIS is an extremely fair and helpful critique of "Died Suddenly". (Unlike another critique, supposedly from a writer on "our side", and who shall remain nameless, which trashed the movie under the pretext of being a "friendly" critique.)
Much improved video. Without flashes of MKUltra, Big Foot, Tom Hanks, etc.
I received harsh criticism in Celia Farber’s and Kirsch’s substack comments because I dared bring up the gratuitous and false statements made in the film- including interpretation of Gates and the heart clot. How unprofessional and deceitful the producers were, willing to deliberately lie for “views.”
This angered people. What angered me was taking a great opportunity to effectively spread the truth and then ruining it.
I don't imagine I'm alone in being put off by the association of this film with Stew Peters, who appears to be more of an entertainer or grifter than sincere advocate for the truth. That's just my impression though, and I realise I could be wrong.
Here's a question that's been bugging me for months. What does all this clotting and spike protein mean for our blood supply? Here in Canada approx 80% of the population took two or more shots, as the coercion and propaganda was terribly effective. Many of them donate blood. I foresee another blood scandal in the making. What do you think?
Thank you so much for all of your wonderful articles!